TESTIMONY OF THE ACCUSED PERSON AND ITS CHECKING IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
نویسندگان
چکیده
On July 6, 2020, the law “Amendments to Criminal Procedure Law” entered into force, which significantly changed attitude of legislator towards right accused testify. The aim study is examine testimony and their examination, paying special attention examination in court. object research person criminal proceedings. Tasks research: 1) find out status from point view proof; 2) analyze regulation legal consequences after amendments Law 6 2020; 3) summarize practice Supreme Court 2020-2022; 4) develop conclusions proposals for solving identified problems. Hypothesis problem accused's became relevant contradictory Law, force on uniform application not ensured practice.
منابع مشابه
the survey of the virtual higher education in iran and the ways of its development and improvement
این پژوهش با هدف "بررسی وضعیت موجود آموزش عالی مجازی در ایران و راههای توسعه و ارتقای آن " و با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و پیمایشی صورت پذیرفته است. بررسی اسنادو مدارک موجود در زمینه آموزش مجازی نشان داد تعداد دانشجویان و مقاطع تحصیلی و رشته محل های دوره های الکترونیکی چندان مطلوب نبوده و از نظر کیفی نیز وضعیت شاخص خدمات آموزشی اساتید و وضعیت شبکه اینترنت در محیط آموزش مجازی نامطلوب است.
Obtaining the child testimony in the criminal proceedings.
Children fall under the special category of vulnerable witnesses. Children's vulnerability is the reason that we must approach obtaining the child's testimony in the criminal proceedings with special attention. It is important to take the child's testimony as soon as possible and to avoid the repetition of interrogation. The criminal proceedings law and the juvenile court law enable children in...
متن کاملThe place of the Principle of Proceedings within a reasonable time in the criminal proceedings
Observing a reasonable deadline throughout the criminal investigation process, as one of the most fundamental defensive rights of the accused, emphasizes the importance of reasonable expediting in the process of proceedings in a high degree of accuracy, which considers necessary for the fair trial and the desired outcome of criminal proceedings. Delivering justice within a reasonable time is on...
متن کاملExpert Testimony in Criminal Proceedings: Questions Daubert Does Not Answer
I strongly believe that we need a very stringent standard of proof in criminal cases. I do not think, however, that Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has been productive in effectuating this goal. In civil cases, courts engage in rigorous gatekeeping and often exclude plaintiffs’ experts because the theory underlying their testimony has not been adequately validated. But I see no sig...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Indiv?ds. Sabiedr?ba. Valsts
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2592-8457']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/iss2022.7010